More aggressive radial-specific guides can also be used, but these may also result in proximal vessel injury. However, most guide catheters are designed for support at the coronary ostia and such maneuvers can traumatize the target coronary artery. One technique to overcome lack of guide catheter support includes deep intubation of the guide catheter. Since most guide catheters were also designed for a TF approach, they may provide less backup support and coaxial alignment for TRI. As a result, less guide backup force is generated. Specifically, guide catheters advanced from the right radial artery often approach the coronary ostia from a vertical downward approach, which excludes the aortic arch. ĭuring trans-radial cardiac catheterization, the anatomic and geometric characteristics of the ascending aorta relative to the catheter differ significantly from TF angiography. Additionally, anatomic variations and lack of guide catheter support increase the technical complexity of TRI. Barriers to TRI include a steep initial learning curve and time required to gain proficiency at TRI. Although TRI is increasingly common, it currently represents < 10% of all PCIs in the USA. Search for this case: Vascular Solutions LLC et al v.Transradial coronary intervention (TRI) is associated with significantly reduced rates of bleeding and access site related complications compared to the transfemoral (TF) approach. Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.Īccess this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Exhibit(s) G, #8 Exhibit(s) H, #9 Exhibit(s) I, #10 Exhibit(s) J, #11 Exhibit(s) K, #12 Exhibit(s) L, #13 Exhibit(s) M, #14 Exhibit(s) N, #15 Exhibit(s) O, #16 Exhibit(s) P, #17 Civil Cover Sheet) (Vandenburgh, J)Īccess additional case information on PACER (Vandenburgh, J)ĬOMPLAINT against Medtronic Vascular, Inc., Medtronic, Inc (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6976431) filed by Vascular Solutions, LLC, Teleflex LLC, Arrow International, Inc., Teleflex Innovations S.a.r.l. Teleflex Incorporated is a publicly-held corporation owning 10 percent or more of stock of Plaintiffs Arrow International, Inc., Teleflex Innovations S.a.r.l., Teleflex LLC, Vascular Solutions, LLC. Teleflex Incorporated is a corporate parent of Plaintiffs Arrow International, Inc., Teleflex Innovations S.a.r.l., Teleflex LLC, Vascular Solutions, LLC. REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). Please use case number 19-cv-1760 JNE/TNL. Ericksen per 3rd/4th Patent list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Summons Issued as to Medtronic Vascular, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. NOTE: the new case number is 19-cv-1760 PJS/TNL. SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vascular Solutions LLC, Teleflex LLC, Arrow International, Inc., Teleflex Innovations S.a.r.l. NOTICE of Appearance by Kurt J Niederluecke on behalf of All Defendants. (Niederluecke, Kurt) Modified text on (lmb). No publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of Medtronic plc stock. Medtronic plc, a publicly held company, is the ultimate parent company for Medtronic, Inc. (Text-only) NOTICE: Status Conference set for at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 9W (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge Tony N. The parties' letters shall not exceed three pages. on Wednesday, July 17, 2019, counsel for each party shall submit a CONFIDENTIAL letter via e-mail to the Court at The confidential letter should set forth with reasonable specificity a brief history of the parties' dispute the relative strengths and weaknesses of each party's position what efforts, if any, the parties have made to resolve the potential motion for a preliminary injunction the last position of each party regarding a preliminary injunction and a litigation budget for the motion for a preliminary injunction. (Text-only) ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT. Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Tony N. NOTICE of Withdrawal as Attorney (Rahlin, Katherine) NOTICE OF AND ORDER FOR PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Pretrial Conference set for at 03:30 PM in Judge's Chambers 9W (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge Tony N. filed by Medtronic Vascular, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. A more recent docket listingĪNSWER to Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs. This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |